This home on Lowenstein Street is a great example of the trade-off between size and age. It is about 200 square feet larger and sold for more overall, but it is seven years older than the home for sale. The interior of 1740 Ripley Woods Street feels more current with its lighter color palette, which often justifies a higher price per square foot in this market.

While this home sold for much less and offers more space, it is important to note the age difference. This property was built in 2003 and features honey oak cabinetry and a more traditional layout, whereas 1740 Ripley Woods Street offers the modern white-and-gray aesthetic buyers love today. You are essentially choosing between more space at a lower price or a turn-key, modern interior.

This is a very direct comparison as it is the same model year and located in the same subdivision. This sold listing offered more square footage for a lower total price, which makes 1740 Ripley Woods Street look a bit expensive by comparison. Since the finishes and age are nearly identical, it is difficult to justify the higher price for the smaller home for sale.